mediumAgent ThreatFramework Vulnerability

LiteLLM Proxy SSRF via user_config Parameter Smuggling

First seen Sep 18, 2026 · Updated Sep 18, 2026

SSRFLiteLLMparameter-smugglingproxyinput-validationLLM-gatewayinternal-network-accessASI05 · Unsafe Code ExecutionSurface: Tool LayerPropagation: Single Hop

LiteLLM Proxy fails to sanitize the `user_config` request body field, allowing an authenticated user with a valid virtual key to smuggle an `api_base` override and force the proxy to send outbound requests to arbitrary hosts. This is a classic server-side request forgery that could let an authenticated caller pivot into internal infrastructure or reach otherwise-blocked endpoints. Exploitation requires authentication, which limits blast radius but does not eliminate the risk in multi-tenant deployments.

Technical Analysis

LiteLLM Proxy's `is_request_body_safe` guard only checks top-level `api_base` and `base_url` keys to prevent SSRF, but the router construction logic also reads `api_base` from within the nested `user_config` object without applying the same validation. An authenticated caller can nest `api_base` inside `user_config` in the request body to bypass the guard entirely, causing the proxy's outbound router to issue requests to attacker-chosen internal or external hosts. This crosses a trust boundary because the proxy acts as an intermediary/agent making privileged network calls on behalf of the model routing layer, and the attacker leverages that trust to reach endpoints (e.g., cloud metadata services, internal APIs) the caller could not otherwise access directly. The entry point is the standard chat/completions request body accepted by any valid virtual key holder, making it exploitable by any tenant in a multi-tenant LiteLLM deployment.

Affected Systems

LiteLLM

Detection Signatures

  • Requests containing `user_config` objects with nested `api_base` or `base_url` keys not matching allow-listed model providers
  • Proxy outbound connections to unexpected internal IP ranges (e.g., 169.254.169.254, RFC1918 addresses) originating from LiteLLM proxy process
  • Anomalous router configuration changes correlated with individual virtual key usage
  • Log entries showing router initialization with non-standard api_base values per-request rather than per-deployment config

Remediation Steps

  1. 1

    Upgrade LiteLLM Proxy

    Update to version 1.83.9 or later, which extends the request body safety guard to cover nested api_base/base_url fields within user_config.

  2. 2

    Restrict virtual key scopes

    Limit which virtual keys are allowed to pass custom user_config or router overrides, especially in multi-tenant environments.

  3. 3

    Egress filtering

    Apply network-level egress controls (firewall/proxy rules) so the LiteLLM proxy host cannot reach internal metadata services or sensitive internal endpoints regardless of application-layer validation.

  4. 4

    Audit logging

    Log and monitor all outbound requests initiated by the proxy, flagging any api_base values that deviate from configured, allow-listed model provider endpoints.

CVE / Advisory IDs

CVE-2026-59823GHSA-hx8v-g79f-8w5f

Industries Most Exposed

TechnologySaaSCloud ServicesAny organization operating multi-tenant LLM gateway infrastructure

Sources

Respond to this threat

Pro subscribers get a full AI-generated incident-response playbook for this threat — detection, containment, eradication, and recovery steps — plus an unlimited AI Threat Advisor for questions about your environment.